Interface GovernanceDenied

Validation category that flagged the issue (e.g., 'budget_compliance', 'regulatory_compliance', 'brand_safety').

ID of the policy that triggered this finding. May reference a registry policy (with source: registry) or a bespoke inline policy (with source: inline). Bespoke policy_ids are unique within their authoring container; use source_plan_id when findings aggregate across multiple plans (e.g., portfolio evaluations).

For portfolio or aggregated evaluations where findings draw on bespoke policies from multiple member plans: identifies the plan whose policy triggered this finding. Omit when the finding's policy_id is unambiguous within the response context (e.g., single-plan check_governance).

Human-readable description of the issue.

Structured details for programmatic consumption.

Confidence score (0-1) in this finding. Distinguishes 'this definitely violates the policy' (0.95) from 'this might violate depending on how audience segments resolve' (0.6). When absent, the finding is presented without a confidence qualifier.

Explanation of why confidence is below 1.0 (e.g., 'Targeting includes regions that partially overlap jurisdiction boundaries'). Present when confidence is below a governance-agent-defined threshold.

Dot-path to the field that needs adjustment (in payload for proposed, in planned_delivery for committed).

The value the field must have for approval. When present, the condition is machine-actionable. When absent, the condition is advisory.

Why this condition is required.